WASHINGTON — President Trump has lengthy been centered on measuring his model, obsessively reviewing tv scores, cataloging his journal covers and fixating on polls.
But Mr. Trump might not like how his model is faring in a single necessary metric: his “E-Score,” a quantity compiled by E-Poll Market Research that’s not publicly out there, however which advertising and marketing executives, community tv stations and advertisers depend on to determine which personalities enchantment to audiences — and which don’t.
Like the Q Score, which measures the enchantment of celebrities, the E-Score calculates consciousness and enchantment of people within the public eye. But it additionally tracks how people rating on greater than 40 character and bodily attributes.
In phrases of these attributes, Mr. Trump was most frequently described as “aggressive” (48 %) and “mean” (38 %), in keeping with his scores from December that had been obtained by The New York Times. He additionally scored excessive for being “insincere,” “confident” and “creepy.” But he scored between zero and four % for the attributes of “sexy,” “impartial,” “handsome” and “physically fit.”
About 29 % of individuals described Mr. Trump as “overexposed.” And his general sturdy constructive enchantment is 14 %, in contrast with an general sturdy adverse enchantment of 39 %.
Among adults over the age of 55, Mr. Trump persistently held extra constructive enchantment than amongst those that are youthful. Mr. Trump additionally persistently held extra constructive enchantment with males than with ladies, throughout all age teams.
Marketing, promoting and leisure executives pay E-Poll Market Research an annual subscription of $17,000 and as much as entry its database, permitting them to investigate the views of American shoppers and assess the advertising and marketing effectiveness of every movie star rated. The firm, which has about 10,000 profiles in its database and surveys about 1,100 on-line members each week, began monitoring Mr. Trump when he was a tv character on “The Apprentice,” in keeping with a spokesman, Randy Parker.
“We do not approve of the use of E-Poll’s data in this story and cannot confirm or deny the information you were given,” he mentioned.
In 2010, through the heyday of “The Apprentice,” Mr. Trump’s Q Score confirmed he was extra in style with African-American and Hispanic audiences than he was with white audiences, in keeping with “Devil’s Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump and the Nationalist Uprising,” by the journalist Joshua Green.
Back then, advertisers seen Mr. Trump as a logo of multiculturalism, in keeping with Mr. Green’s guide. But Mr. Trump not has an up to date Q Score as a result of he left the leisure trade; the corporate Marketing Evaluations stopped monitoring him within the winter of 2015.
“He definitely had the profile of a ‘love to hate’ personality going into the election,” mentioned Henry Schafer, govt vice chairman of the corporate. “He had one of the lowest positive Q Scores and one of the highest negative Q Scores. It looks like he just continued doing that up until today.”
Mr. Schafer mentioned the important thing to Mr. Trump’s success was “extremely high awareness,” even when a lot of it was adverse. “You always have a portion of the population that enjoys that kind of reality, and that’s his base,” he mentioned.
Officials within the Trump White House additionally obtain E-Scores, partly as a result of networks usually wish to know the way these officers are perceived.
Ivanka Trump, the president’s elder daughter, has about 70 % identify recognition, in contrast with 35 % for her husband, Jared Kushner; 37 % for Kellyanne Conway, a White House counselor; and 37 % for Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the press secretary, in a reminder of the overwhelming movie star energy of her final identify. Mr. Kushner and Ms. Conway’s scores had been from May, whereas Ms. Trump’s and Ms. Sanders’s rating had been compiled in December.
In phrases of facial recognition, Ms. Trump scored 47 %, barely greater than Ms. Conway and Ms. Sanders, probably the most public-facing administration officers, who each scored a 32 % for facial recognition.
Ms. Trump’s general sturdy constructive enchantment was 12 %, in contrast with an general sturdy adverse enchantment of 21 %. While Ms. Trump was extra disliked than preferred amongst all ages group by women and men alike, she persistently had a slight edge with males over ladies.
Ms. Trump is hottest amongst adults over the age of 55 and least in style with adults between the ages of 18 and 24.
In an inventory of attributes that celebrities are graded on, Ms. Trump was most frequently described as “attractive” (32 %), “beautiful” (28 %) and “glamorous” (25 %). She ranked lowest on “funny” (1 %), “can identify with” (2 %) and “exciting” (three %).
That was greater than the scores for Mr. Kushner, whose general sturdy constructive enchantment was 6 % and whose general sturdy adverse enchantment was 36 %. Mr. Kushner not often seems on tv and has no social media profile. But he is a continuing determine within the information, given his broad portfolios and affect within the White House.
Mr. Kushner scored highest for the attributes of “insincere” (29 %), “creepy” (27 %) and “overexposed” (22 %). He was lowest by way of “exciting,” “glamorous” and “emotional,” ranking 1 % in these classes.
Ms. Conway, a daily presence on community and cable tv touting Mr. Trump’s accomplishments and criticizing the way in which he’s coated, had a robust constructive enchantment of 9 % and a robust adverse enchantment of 43 %.
Ms. Sanders, who has phased out the common White House press briefing, which regularly had contentious back-and-forths with reporters, and is now extra usually seen in friendlier venues just like the morning present “Fox & Friends,” ranked considerably greater, with a robust constructive enchantment of 19 % and a robust adverse enchantment of 28 %.
The scores present the general public views Ms. Sanders as extra of an trustworthy dealer than Ms. Conway, who grew to become notorious within the administration’s early days for coining the phrase “alternative facts.”
Ms. Sanders scored 15 % for “trustworthy,” in contrast with Ms. Conway’s eight % rating in the identical class. Ms. Conway was described by 31 % of respondents as “insincere,” in contrast with 27 % for Ms. Sanders.
Get more stuff like this
Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.