Palau Bans Many Kinds of Sunscreen, Citing Threat to Coral


SYDNEY, Australia — The Western Pacific nation of Palau has become the first country to ban many kinds of sunscreen, in a move to protect its coral reefs from chemicals that scientists say cause significant damage.

Under the ban, which will take effect in 2020, “reef toxic” sunscreen — defined as containing one of 10 prohibited chemicals, a list that could grow later — can be confiscated from tourists when they enter the country, and retailers who sell it can be fined up to $1,000.

Damage to coral reefs worldwide from climate change has been widely reported, but scientists say there is growing evidence that chemicals from sunscreen, which washes off swimmers or enters the ocean through sewer systems, also causes grave harm.

Palau passed the ban into law last week. President Tommy Remengesau called it “especially timely,” saying that a major impetus was a 2017 report that found sunscreen products to be “widespread” in Jellyfish Lake, one of the country’s Unesco World Heritage sites.

Not all sunscreens are “reef toxic.” But “some of the sunscreens without these chemicals are quite expensive, which is a disincentive,” Dr. Ward said. “I’m sure someone will get it soon, and put out these products at an affordable rate.”

The most common commercial sunscreen brands contain oxybenzone, Dr. Ward said. But she also warned against mineral-based sunscreens containing zinc oxide. They were once considered safer for coral, she said, but a recent study found that zinc oxide can cause coral bleaching as well as microbial enrichment, causing more bacteria to form in the water.

“I think wearing fabrics on your body is the best alternative to sunscreen,” she said. “We have stinger suits in the summer, when it’s too hot for a wet suit. Cover your whole body in Lycra — an attractive look, if you can imagine.”

She noted that reefs are under threat from major, global phenomena, including global warming and pollution of the oceans. By comparison, she said, sunscreen is “the one that we can solve.”

Sunscreen manufacturers, not surprisingly, opposed the Hawaii ban. But they aren’t alone in arguing that commercial sunscreens do more good than harm.

“At the moment, research on sunscreens’ effects on coral is limited,” said Heather Walker, chairwoman of the Cancer Council Australia’s National Skin Cancer Committee. “By contrast, the evidence that sunscreen prevents skin cancer is conclusive. In this context, a ban is hasty.”

Currently, Ms. Walker said, there is no accepted standard for what constitutes “environmentally friendly” sunscreen. “We would be concerned if Australians stopped using sunscreen more generally,” she said.

Kim Do, a senior industry analyst at IBIS World, a market research company, said the new bans would cause sunscreen manufacturers to review the ingredients used in their products, though not immediately. She said the industry was “expected to continue undertaking product research and development to meet changing consumer demands.”



Source link Nytimes.com

Get more stuff like this

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.