Democrats requested for summaries from interviews with Annie Donaldson, Mr. McGahn’s chief of employees; Hope Hicks, the previous White House communications director; Reince Priebus and John F. Kelly, former White House chiefs of employees; Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trump’s onetime fixer and private lawyer; and Mr. Sessions, amongst others.
Democrats had additionally requested detailed notes taken by Ms. Donaldson about White House conferences and Mr. McGahn’s interactions with the president, in addition to notes taken by Joseph H. Hunt, Mr. Sessions’s chief of employees when he was legal professional basic. Other paperwork within the narrowed request included a draft letter justifying the firing of James B. Comey as F.B.I. director, a White House counsel memo on the firing of Michael T. Flynn as nationwide safety adviser and different paperwork created by the White House.
Democrats referenced a few of that proof at Monday’s listening to as they marched via Mr. Mueller’s report.
“Professor McQuade, what purpose or function does note-taking serve for lawyers?” requested Representative Karen Bass, Democrat of California, referring to one of many witnesses, Barbara McQuade, a former United States legal professional in Michigan.
Representative Ted Lieu, one other California Democrat, stated, “Let’s talk about Jeff Sessions’s recusal.”
Mostly, Democrats received what they have been in search of.
“The obstruction described in the report created a risk to our national security,” Ms. McQuade stated. “It was designed to prevent investigators from learning all the facts about an attack on our country.”
Republicans turned to their witness, John Malcolm of the conservative Heritage Foundation.
“While it is certainly true that no man, including the president of the United States, is above the law, it is equally true that the president occupies a unique position in our constitutional structure and that some laws apply differently to him and some don’t apply at all,” he stated.