Johnson flies back to face UK parliament as Brexit chaos deepens

LONDON (Reuters) – A defiant Prime Minister Boris Johnson was flying house early on Wednesday after the Supreme Court dominated he had unlawfully suspended parliament, ad infinitum to Britain’s deep political disaster over Brexit.

Johnson is set to lead Britain out of the European Union on Oct. 31, with or with out an exit settlement, however most members of parliament are equally decided to forestall a so-called “no-deal Brexit” state of affairs.

The House of Commons, the place Johnson has no majority, will reconvene at 1130 a.m. (1030 GMT) after the Supreme Court dominated on Tuesday that his resolution to droop it for 5 weeks was illegal and subsequently null and void.

It is unclear precisely what’s going to occur subsequent. Johnson has rejected calls from some political opponents to resign. The principal opposition Labour Party is itself deeply cut up over Brexit, and seems to be vacillating about whether or not to launch a movement of no-confidence to attempt to convey Johnson down.

Johnson has repeatedly mentioned his most popular Brexit final result could be to agree an exit take care of the EU’s 27 different members earlier than the Oct. 31 deadline, and that he was hopeful he would obtain that.

However, EU negotiators say he has made no new proposals able to breaking the impasse over the problem of how to handle the border between Ireland, an EU member, and Northern Ireland, which is a part of the United Kingdom, after Brexit.

Against that backdrop, reactions to the Supreme Court’s blistering ruling amongst British politicians confirmed that divisions had been deeper than ever.


Jacob Rees-Mogg, the chief of the House of Commons and some of the ardent advocates of Brexit, was reported by British newspapers to have mentioned throughout a convention name with Johnson and different cupboard members on Tuesday that the Supreme Court had carried out a “constitutional coup”.

Johnson himself was combative after the ruling, telling reporters in New York on Tuesday that he strongly disagreed with the Supreme Court justices, and complaining that there have been many individuals making an attempt to thwart Brexit in opposition to the need of the individuals.

On the opposite facet of the divide, considered one of Johnson’s personal former cupboard members, Amber Rudd, mentioned it might be irresponsible for the federal government to forged the ruling as an anti-Brexit transfer when Johnson’s protection all alongside was that his resolution to droop parliament within the first place had nothing to do with Brexit.

Former minister Dominic Grieve, an influential member of parliament and an anti-Johnson insurgent inside the ruling Conservative Party, accused the prime minister of behaving “like a bull in a china shop”.

Grieve instructed Sky News early on Wednesday that Johnson ought to abandon his makes an attempt to drive by means of a no-deal Brexit which had no assist in parliament, and as an alternative have interaction in wise dialogue with legislators to discover a means out of the quagmire.

“My judgment is that there’s only one way out and that is to have a second referendum, because otherwise we’re going to carry on going round in circles. But he’s entitled to put other ideas forward if he thinks he’s got them,” Grieve mentioned.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson addresses the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., September 24, 2019. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

“He says he wants to get a deal but there’s no evidence he’s even started negotiating a deal with the EU and it’s quite clear that the House of Commons and parliament will not accept leaving without an agreement because it’s so damaging for the future of our country.”

Before the suspension, parliament had handed a legislation requiring Johnson to ask the EU to push back the Oct. 31 deadline if no exit deal was agreed by Oct. 19. Asked by reporters on Tuesday how he deliberate to overcome that impediment, Johnson merely ignored the query and insisted Brexit would happen on Oct. 31, come what could.

Reporting by Estelle Shirbon; Editing by Mark Potter

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source link

Get more stuff like this

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.