How Facebook’s P.R. Firm Brought Political Trickery to Tech


SAN FRANCISCO — When Tim Miller, a longtime Republican political operative, moved to the Bay Area final yr to arrange a public relations store, he introduced with him tradecraft extra typical of Washington than Silicon Valley.

He was effectively versed in opposition analysis — the pursuit of damaging intelligence a couple of political enemy. He had ties to on-line media provocateurs. And, above all, he understood the worth of secrecy.

Mr. Miller had arrived on the proper second along with his firm, Definers Public Affairs. With prospects and lawmakers questioning the avowed good intentions and energy of tech’s largest firms, Facebook and others had been on the defensive.

Definers rapidly discovered loads of enterprise, from start-ups like Lyft, Lime and Juul to giants like Facebook and Qualcomm, the influential chip firm that was in a nasty authorized combat with Apple over royalties, in accordance to 5 individuals with direct information of Mr. Miller’s work who declined to be named due to confidentiality agreements.

While working for Qualcomm, Definers pushed the concept that Apple’s chief government, Timothy D. Cook, was a viable presidential candidate in 2020, in accordance to a former Definers worker and digital data. Presumably, it was an try to chill the cordial relations that Mr. Cook had cultivated with the Trump administration.

The marketing campaign by Definers signaled an escalation of Silicon Valley’s already brass-knuckled method to public relations.

“This type of dirty P.R.? It’s always been there, but it’s definitely on the upswing,” stated Jonathan Hirshon, who was a public relations consultant for know-how firms for 3 a long time, together with Apple and Sony. “The idealism is still there, but the truth is, the big companies have become a lot more authoritarian in their approach to the media.”

Facebook fired Definers final week after The New York Times detailed the work Mr. Miller’s firm had done on behalf of the social media company. Definers encouraged reporters to write about the financial connections between anti-Facebook activists and the liberal financier George Soros, drawing accusations that it was relying on anti-Semitic tropes.

Definers’s strategy played to a target’s pressure points. Most of what Definers produced for Qualcomm had nothing to do with its beef with Apple, which was a complex legal fight over the royalties Apple should pay for the Qualcomm chips it was using in iPhones.

Definers employees distributed anti-Apple research to reporters and would not say who was paying for it. Definers distributed a 13-page memo titled “Apple Bowing to Chinese Cyber Regulators” that detailed how Apple’s activity in China contradicted its public stance on privacy elsewhere. It also planted dozens of negative articles about Apple on conservative news sites, according to a person familiar with the work and emails reviewed by The New York Times.

Qualcomm officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The feuds among the tech industry’s giants have hardly been genteel over the years. Big companies often tip reporters to bad news about other companies and urge regulators to examine competitors.

A campaign by Microsoft, referred to as “Scroogled,” highlighted what it called Google’s privacy violations. From 2012 to 2014, it took out print and television ads that claimed Google was reading people’s emails, a charge the internet company denied.

Google has more recently been targeted with negative stories tipped to reporters by a group called the Campaign for Accountability. The group was quietly funded by the database maker Oracle, which has spent years in an intellectual property court fight with Google over Java, a programming tool owned by Oracle.

Matt Rhoades, Definers’s chief executive, said in a statement that the firm’s work “is absolutely no different than what public affairs firms do every day for their clients across industries and issues across the country. We are proud of the work we do for our clients.”

Juul, which has been accused of marketing its e-cigarettes to children, is working with Definers to improve its public image and communicate with reporters.

The ride-hailing company Lyft used Definers to help navigate regulatory challenges in statehouses across the country, including choosing which Lyft drivers to pitch to the media for interviews, according to a person familiar with the work.

And the scooter company Lime hired Definers in August because it wanted an outside contractor to take a more aggressive tack against rivals, according to a person familiar with that work. Lyft and Lime have since ended their work with Definers.

Mr. Pounder said in a statement on Tuesday that NTK is regularly pitched by people in public relations and the media. “What NTK writes and posts on is what NTK chooses to write and post on,” he added.

Definers also used other outlets to disseminate its work. In July 2017, Mr. Miller wrote an article that accused Mr. Cook of lying to President Trump about building Apple factories in the United States, according to an email reviewed by The Times.

He emailed the piece to the right-wing provocateur Charles C. Johnson, according to the email, who published it on his website GotNews without a byline or other disclosures that it came from Mr. Miller, Definers or Qualcomm.

Mr. Miller said in a text message to The Times that Definers pitched the angle to a range of news outlets. “Two years into the administration it’s clear we were right,” he added.

Mr. Johnson said he had a falling out with Mr. Miller because of Mr. Miller’s criticism of Mr. Trump.

Definers’s focus on Mr. Cook extended to a campaign it ran to promote the Apple chief as a 2020 presidential candidate. A slick website titled “Draft Tim Cook 2020” had digital links to Definers employees, said Kyle Ehmke, a cybersecurity researcher for the firm ThreatConnect.

In a memo made public by Facebook on Wednesday, Elliot Schrage, Facebook’s communications and policy chief, assumed responsibility for hiring Definers and said Facebook asked the P.R. firm to investigate whether Mr. Soros had “financial motivation” to criticize Facebook.

Mr. Schrage, a longtime confidante of Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s chief operating officer, had already announced plans to leave Facebook. Ms. Sandberg, who had previously said she did not know about Definers, admitted in an online comment attached to the memo that she had been informed about the company in emails and other materials.



Source link Nytimes.com

Get more stuff like this

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.