Can we discuss beginning pitchers or, extra to the level, their ritual sacrifice on the altar of Major League Baseball analytics?
I put this query to Leo Mazzone, the former pitching coach for the Atlanta Braves and the custodian of one of baseball’s biggest rotations of beginning pitchers: Greg Maddux, John Smoltz and Tom Glavine, Hall of Famers all.
The 2018 playoffs and World Series supplied a parade of twitchy managers yanking their beginning pitchers after 4 innings, summoning a parade of faceless relievers to throw one mind-numbing fastball after one other for fractions of an inning.
This is spectacular for the radar gun trade, however is it watchable and good baseball?
I heard Mazzone snorting on the different finish of the telephone line, no, no and no. “It is an embarrassment and insults the intelligence,” he mentioned. “They are abusing pitchers and calling it smart.”
Mazzone imparted this gospel to his pitchers: Trying to heave balls as quick as you may is for muscle-beach dolts. pitcher throws at 85 to 90 % of effort and makes the pitch transfer and hit its location. Varies speeds, too. As for the notion a pitcher can final however 5 – 6 innings earlier than batters develop smart and clobber him?
“A high school coach asked me, ‘Leo what do you think of analytics showing that pitchers struggle the third time through a lineup?’ I’ll tell you want that is, that’s the manager covering his (you know what),” he mentioned.
The equation guys who run most main league groups bow to holy verities: No beginning pitcher ought to throw greater than 100 pitches. Some starters mustn’t throw as many as 70. To admire the quantity of wins a pitcher accumulates or to encourage him to toss an entire recreation is to show your self as a Paleolithic hunter-gatherer. Pitching is all about WHIP and FIP (I’d clarify the definitions, however then our heads would damage) and a conga line of reduction pitchers.
Look, on a superb day I don’t drag my knuckles alongside the sidewalks of Flatbush, Brooklyn. I dig sabermetrics and again in the day handled Bill James annuals as spiritual textual content. I hold a three-foot-high stack of the analytics-obsessed Baseball Prospectus at dwelling. But in danger of registering as a get-off-my-lawn crank: So a lot of the knowledge about pitchers is doubtful.
I set to fascinated about this after watching my Mets spend a lot of November and December in a modestly lunatic try and commerce Noah Syndergaard, one of the National League’s greatest beginning pitchers. They seem to have failed at this self-mutilation. Now that they’ve retained two true aces — Syndergaard and Jacob deGrom, the Cy Young Award winner — why not stretch them out and push them to go deeper into video games? What is the level in permitting an ace to pitch six innings earlier than turning the ball over to a committee of nameless relievers?
Game Four of the 2018 World Series introduced one thing of a nadir when Los Angeles Dodgers Manager Dave Roberts, a vivid fellow little question, pulled his beginning pitcher after he had yielded a single hit by six and a 3rd innings and was forward, Four-Zero. The Dodgers ended up marching six relievers into that recreation, misplaced, 9-6, and exited the World Series the subsequent day.
Mazzone pulled out a couple of of his remaining hairs.
“The greatest teacher for a pitcher is starts,” he says. “Pitch and pitch and pitch. Let a pitcher discover himself.
“The downside is that so many pitching coaches and managers are yes-men and don’t need to problem their entrance workplaces.”
There’s a large mound of statistical proof to again such assertions. At danger of giving the quadratic dudes a seizure, I turned to Baseball Reference and selected 40 pitchers from the past half-century, men who ran the gamut from solid to superb. These are the sort of pitchers you’d expect to see in the postseason, and my list included Bobby Ojeda, Mike Torrez, Steve Avery, Tom Browning, Tom Seaver, Steve Carlton, Ferguson Jenkins and Mazzone’s troika of Hall of Famers. I examined their performances across games, from beginning to end.
For most good pitchers, their worst inning was the first. Once they found a rhythm and once pitches began to crackle, they became progressively more difficult to hit. Tom Seaver’s career earned run average in the first inning was 3.75. His E.R.A. for the last three innings of a game, that dreaded third and fourth time through the batting order, stood at 2.75.
So current analytic wisdom does a headstand.
(By way of insane outlier, Seaver won 25 games in 1969 and helped pitch the Miracle Mets to a World Series championship. He pitched the ninth inning 17 times that season and surrendered not a single run.)
This is a familiar pattern. Mike Mussina gave up fewer runs on average in the seventh, eighth and ninth innings than he did in the first three. He was at his best in the ninth inning. The best inning for Ron Darling and David Wells was the eighth. (Requisite caveat: By definition, these pitchers were having a good outing if they made it to the late innings.)
If you hoped to beat Dodgers pitcher Fernando Valenzuela, you were advised to start hacking early. He had a career E.R.A. of 4.25 in the first inning. When Valenzuela was still pitching in the ninth inning, and he got there roughly 127 times in his career, his E.R.A. was 2.19.
Luis Tiant, the Red Sox and Cleveland ace, was nearly as tough. He pitched just over 206 times in the ninth inning and had an E.R.A. of 2.40.
Greg Maddux had a 3.23 E.R.A. in his first three innings and a 2.86 from the seventh inning through the ninth. And while he possessed a good fastball, it was not a three-digit express train. One spring training in the mid-1990s, Maddux, who in a 23-year career piled up 355 fairly meaningful wins, asked to speak with the team’s young pitchers.
Mazzone nodded. Sure thing, Mad Dog, whatever you want. The coach lined up the young guys and Maddux walked over.
“You know why I am a millionaire? Because I can put my fastball wherever I want to,” Maddux told them. “Do you know why I own beachfront property in L.A.? Because I can change speeds. O.K., questions?”
Mazzone was not enraptured by pitch counts. He would not push pitchers to stupid extremes, but he refused to hew to limits without basis in medical fact. He had pitchers run and throw every day in between starts, and they had remarkably few injuries. In one three-year stretch, his pitchers missed a single start.
“We kept track of pitches and I had a clicker,” he said, “but if Tommy Glavine gets a pop-up on a changeup, hell, I’m not counting that.”
He recalled a Braves vice president by the name of Henry Aaron who offered advice about the dangers of radar gun intoxication. “Don’t worry about pure speed,” Aaron said. “You can run a jet airliner through the strike zone, and I will figure out how to rope it down the line. Locate a ball that moves at my knees, and I’m out.”
All of which brings me back to the Mets, a team I’ve followed for many, often hapless, decades. Their manager, Mickey Callaway, sounds as enamored of pitch counts as his peers are. All of this seeps into the brainpans of young pitchers who labor under the impression that five or six innings constitute a day’s work.
Syndergaard is a fine pitcher and susceptible to the idiocies of the age. A year ago he pumped iron in the off-season in hopes of throwing even harder than 100 miles per hour, and that season he blew a muscle in his side. He appears to accept the notion that pitching through the seventh inning lies beyond the limit of human exertion, and last season he posted a 7.88 E.R.A. in that inning.
His rotation mates are no different. On the rare occasions they pitched into the seventh inning, Zack Wheeler and Steven Matz posted calamitous E.R.A.s of 5.65 and 6.35.
Mazzone went to Cooperstown in 2014 for the Hall of Fame inductions of Maddux and Glavine. They got to yakking before the ceremony, and Mazzone asked what they would have done if, in the course of pitching a World Series shutout, he had come to the mound to pull them from the game.
Glavine looked at him, smiled thinly and replied, “Mazz, we were going to have a fight on that mound.”
Get more stuff like this
Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.
Thank you for subscribing.
Something went wrong.