Carey Mulligan Won’t Let Hollywood Off the Hook


Not each Carey Mulligan film begins with a Charli XCX tune, however perhaps extra of them ought to. When “Promising Young Woman” deploys the 2017 pop bop “Boys” in its opening moments, it’s the first signal you’re about to get one thing from Mulligan that you simply’re not used to: particularly, a recent setting.

“I know that for a cinema audience, I’m just constantly in period costume,” Mulligan stated not too long ago, shrugging her shoulders in an outsized pink sweater. She was video-chatting with me from her British nation home in Devon, the place she had sequestered herself in a darkened music room usually utilized by her husband, Marcus Mumford, from the band Mumford & Sons. A single, solitary lamp illuminated her, as single, solitary lamps typically do with Mulligan.

You’ll discover little greater than a meager mild supply in a lot of the 35-year-old actress’s most up-to-date films, which embrace “Far From the Madding Crowd,” set round 1870, “Suffragette,” about equal-rights protests in 1912 Britain, and “Mudbound,” which begins in the 12 months 1939. It has been practically a decade since Mulligan starred in a modern-day movie — Steve McQueen’s “Shame,” from 2011 — a span of time that originally stunned even her.

“I think of ‘Wildlife’ as being kind of contemporary!” she insisted. I needed to level out that the 2018 home drama, by which Mulligan performs a stressed mom on the brink of an affair, takes place 60 years in the past.

This shouldn’t be essentially an excellent or dangerous factor, however it’s a factor, and it’s a part of the cause that “Promising Young Woman” lands like a lightning strike: Imagine the cognitive dissonance of taking, say, Audrey Hepburn out of her midcentury roles and plopping her right into a totally 2020 film about consent, revenge and stalking your school acquaintances on Facebook. And think about, in doing so, that she turned in the efficiency of her profession.

A black comedy informed in pastels, “Promising Young Woman” casts Mulligan as Cassie, a disaffected med-school dropout whose life has by no means been the identical since her greatest pal was raped in school. Lately, Cassie has give you a confrontational strategy to cope with her grief: She’ll go to a nightclub, prepare herself in a weak place — usually slumped on a banquette, performing too drunk to face and even converse — and wait to see if a man will seize upon the tableau as a chance. Depressingly, somebody all the time does.

Of course, the man doesn’t assume he’s doing something unsuitable: He’s simply providing Cassie a “safe ride home” that occurs to return to his place. There, he’ll advance on her splayed physique till Cassie out of the blue sits up, revealing her sobriety simply as he’s about to assault her. “But I’m a nice guy!” he’ll sputter, caught in the act. Cassie’s inevitable reply: “Are you?”

The movie is a tonal tightrope stroll, and Mulligan is astonishing in it. There is a lot about Cassie that an actress could be tempted to overplay — her biting humorousness, her well-defended soulsickness, the startling lengths to which she’ll go in her mission — however Mulligan makes the character really feel achingly actual. And generally, as if it had been as simple as respiration, she will convey all of these warring traits in the house of a single line.

“I never feel like I need to agree with everything that a character does for me to be along with the ride, and we never do with men,” Mulligan said. “Cassie has every right to be as closed down, as abrasive, as unpleasant, as vindictive as she likes, because she’s been through hell. But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t care about her.”

LAST MONTH, IT HAPPENED AGAIN. Mulligan was reading a screenplay and when a female character was introduced, the description said, “Beautiful but doesn’t know it.”

If you’re an actress in Hollywood, you’re familiar with that phrase. And in the 10 years since Mulligan was nominated for an Oscar for playing a schoolgirl seduced by an older man in “An Education,” she has certainly come across that sort of description more than she’d like.

“I kind of can’t believe it still happens,” she said. “But it does.”

We wondered aloud about the deeper meaning of a description like that. Do men write it to turn other men on? Maybe to them, it isn’t pertinent whether a female character is a nurse, a marketing executive or a serial killer — what matters most is conveying that this fictional woman is out of your league, but you’d still have a shot with her.

It may seem like a little thing, but those little things add up in Hollywood, where the way women are viewed becomes something the whole world can watch. That’s why Fennell told all the men to play their nightclub scenes with Mulligan as though they were the heroes of their own romantic comedy: In another era, they would have been.

Just look at seminal comedies like “Animal House,” in which a college freshman debates date-raping a passed-out girl, or “Sixteen Candles,” when Molly Ringwald’s love interest leaves his blackout-drunk girlfriend with a virgin nerd and tells him, “Do anything you want.”

“I’ve seen all these films and laughed along and didn’t really think about it,” Mulligan said. “And then you sit back and think, ‘Oh gosh, that’s actually not funny at all. That’s horrendous!’ It really takes some thought to not just go along with those laughs.”

Fennell concurred. “It’s so embedded in our culture that so many people don’t really understand what’s wrong about it still,” she said. “I wanted to have a film that shows them, that’s sneaking it in the guise of something fun.”

The movie they’ve made is as sticky and dangerous as a spider’s web, and men’s reactions to it can be telling. Before the pandemic scuttled its original spring release, “Promising Young Woman” had a buzzy debut in January at the Sundance Film Festival. I asked Mulligan if she had read any of the responses to it then, and she winced.

“I read the Variety review, because I’m a weak person,” Mulligan said. “And I took issue with it.” She paused, debating whether she really wanted to go there. “It felt like it was basically saying that I wasn’t hot enough to pull off this kind of ruse,” she said, finally.

Though “Promising Young Woman” earned its fair share of raves at Sundance, Variety seemed stumped by the movie and strongly implied that Mulligan had been miscast. “Margot Robbie is a producer here, and one can (perhaps too easily) imagine the role might once have been intended for her,” read the review. “Whereas with this star, Cassie wears her pickup-bait gear like bad drag; even her long blond hair feels like a put-on.”

Mulligan can still recite some of the lines from that review. But she said, “It wasn’t some sort of ego-wounding thing — like, I fully can see that Margot Robbie is a goddess.” What bothered Mulligan most was that people might read a high-profile critique of any actress’s physical appearance and blithely accept it: “It drove me so crazy. I was like, ‘Really? For this film, you’re going to write something that is so transparent? Now? In 2020?’ I just couldn’t believe it.”

It’s all the more ironic for Mulligan because “Promising Young Woman” explicitly grapples with the litany of cultural expectations about how a woman ought to look and behave. There’s even a man who calls Cassie beautiful and then, in the same breath, gives her a disingenuous lecture about why she’s wearing too much makeup.

“We don’t allow women to look normal anymore, or like a real person,” Mulligan said. “Why does every woman who’s ever onscreen have to look like a supermodel? That has shifted into something where the expectation of beauty and perfection onscreen has gotten completely out of control.”

Men were hardly more enlightened in the period pieces Mulligan has made, but that was often the point of those movies, wasn’t it? When her characters asserted their independence, as in “Far From the Madding Crowd,” or fought for the right to vote in “Suffragette,” you could watch from your privileged vantage point in the present and think, “They were ahead of their time.” In that way and in others, they were modern women, too.

You expect more these days, but maybe you shouldn’t. Maybe that’s the lesson of “Promising Young Woman”: that you’d better stay on your toes, and that you’ll have to push back even when people would rather you just drop it. Even Mulligan, after a brief crisis of confidence — “Maybe I shouldn’t have said it was Variety,” she fretted — would eventually decide that what she wanted to say was worth committing to. The more we idealize women, she told me, the more we rob them of what actually makes them interesting.

“I just don’t think that’s really what storytelling or acting needs to be about,” she said. “Things can be beautiful without being perfect.”



Source link Nytimes.com

Get more stuff like this

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.