Blockbuster Battle Between Steven Spielberg and Netflix Fizzles

LOS ANGELES — It has the makings of an excellent screenplay: As the way forward for a complete business hangs within the steadiness, the final word institution determine — a genius in his fourth decade of domination — goes to battle with a menacing interloper.

That hyperbolic story line has enveloped Steven Spielberg since early final month, when reviews surfaced that he deliberate to suggest Oscar rule modifications that will block movies which might be primarily distributed on-line from competing. “Spielberg: Ban Netflix From Oscars” learn one headline.

Right now, the academy guidelines permit any movie that performs for one week in a theater in Los Angeles to compete. They additionally permit for films to be out there for streaming on the similar time that they’re enjoying in theaters.

The Spielberg vs. Netflix maelstrom grew to become so frenzied, significantly on Twitter, the place the director was branded as an out-of-touch crank, that the Justice Department despatched an uncommon letter to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences warning that modifications to its eligibility guidelines might elevate antitrust considerations.

Unbowed, in accordance with some commerce information shops, Mr. Spielberg was to suggest his rule change at an Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences board assembly on Tuesday evening in Beverly Hills. “The Spielberg-Netflix Showdown” is how IndieWire described the closed-door session in a preview article.

There was just one catch. Mr. Spielberg, 72, was not going to be there, much less propose any rule changes. He was not even in town. His schedule had long called for him to be in New York, where rehearsals are underway for his next film project, a remake of “West Side Story,” according to a person who works for him, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss his private itinerary.

In fact, Mr. Spielberg’s animosity toward Netflix appears to have been acutely overstated.

Mr. Spielberg has been publicly silent through all of it. But inside his company, Amblin Entertainment, Mr. Spielberg has expressed frustration with the way his views about streaming have recently been characterized in the news media, according to two people close to him, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to maintain their relationship. Yes, he believes that theater owners, streaming services and traditional studios need to come together to figure out a way to protect what he likes to call the “motion picture theatrical art form.” If the academy were to come up with a reasonable way to ensure that only films with robust theatrical releases are eligible for Oscars, there is a strong chance he would vote for it, the people said.

But a geriatric Luddite who wants to kill Netflix?

His primary beef is not with Netflix, according to the people close to him. Rather, he is frustrated that exhibitors have been unwilling to compromise. The multiplex chains have fought off any effort to shorten the exclusive period they get to play films of any genre, which is currently about 90 days. In January, after “Roma” was nominated for the best picture Oscar, Mr. Spielberg even called AMC and Regal, the largest theater companies, and implored them to play the Netflix film even though it was already available online. They refused.

Mr. Spielberg, who swings between serious dramas (“The Color Purple,” “Schindler’s List”) and big-budget fantasies (“Jurassic Park,” “Ready Player One”), appears to recognize that more is at stake at this moment in Hollywood than awards eligibility. As streaming services proliferate — Disney will roll out its offering on Nov. 12, with Apple, WarnerMedia and Comcast not far behind — movie theaters could become even more reliant on superheroes, sequels and remakes.

Could there soon come a day when popcorn movies like “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” arrive in theaters but more sober films like “Lincoln” go directly to a streaming service? It’s not a far-fetched concern given the film industry’s current trajectory. Moreover, some important new voices whose work has emerged on Netflix — Dee Rees (“Mudbound”), Cary Joji Fukunaga (“Beasts of No Nation”) — have had their films excluded from theaters because the streaming service and the multiplex chains have been at loggerheads.

Asked in an interview at a recent convention for movie theater operators whether he would consider reducing the 90-day period of exclusivity for certain film genres, Adam Aron, the chief executive of AMC, said: “Shocking as it may be, it’s better not to have those negotiations in the pages of The New York Times. Having said that, AMC has a willingness to consider alternatives to the current status quo — if, and it’s a big if, underline it with a red Sharpie — any change would benefit the shareholders of AMC.”

Source link

Get more stuff like this

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.